Skip to content

What AI Cites

Explore Methodology About

Search websites, topics, or cited URLs

Loading…

What AI Cites

Methodology Coverage About Corrections Licensing review

digitalapi.ai source evidence — What AI Cites

Explore/Website/digitalapi.ai

digitalapi.ai

Measured panel · Aug 2, 2026

59 of 21,320 measured prompts cited digitalapi.ai.

Observed citation support, not traffic, demand, quality, or a forecast. Methodology

Topics

Showing 8 of 20 measured topics

Product Teams and customer-facing Integrations26 of 420 measured prompts Help SaaS and SaaS Products and Integrations9 of 198 measured prompts OAuth and Refresh and Integrations3 of 98 measured prompts API Credentials and Authentication and OAuth2 of 35 measured prompts Automation AI and AI Agents2 of 342 measured prompts Mcp Servers2 of 31 measured prompts Secure and Integrations Regulated and Customers Build2 of 25 measured prompts App Connections and Settings and Thousands Apps1 of 25 measured prompts

View public topics →

Cited pages

Showing 0 of 32 safe exact pages

No safe exact pages are available for this website.

Search this website’s pages →

Cited alongside

Showing 8 relationships

reddit.com56 shared prompts · Compare mulesoft.com37 shared prompts · Compare prismatic.io35 shared prompts · Compare arxiv.org28 shared prompts · Compare workato.com28 shared prompts · Compare merge.dev27 shared prompts · Compare unified.to26 shared prompts · Compare apideck.com24 shared prompts · Compare

Not observed for supported topics

Supported measured topics where this website was not observed. This is an evidence boundary, not a recommendation or proof of a content gap.

Showing 6 topics

Construction software and suppliers703 eligible prompts Global payroll and international work453 eligible prompts Privacy Blockchain and Private294 eligible prompts Medallia and Iterate and Discussio273 eligible prompts Identity Verification251 eligible prompts Contract Review and Counsel and Word240 eligible prompts

Own this website? Request a licensing review →