Skip to content

What AI Cites

Explore Methodology About

Search websites, topics, or cited URLs

Loading…

What AI Cites

Methodology Coverage About Corrections Licensing review

fokal.com source evidence — What AI Cites

Explore/Website/fokal.com

fokal.com

Measured panel · Aug 2, 2026

95 of 21,320 measured prompts cited fokal.com.

Observed citation support, not traffic, demand, quality, or a forecast. Methodology

Topics

Showing 8 of 13 measured topics

Brand Mentions and AI Brand24 of 192 measured prompts AI Visibility and Visibility Tool and Visibility Tracking22 of 139 measured prompts AI Citations and Cited AI11 of 130 measured prompts AI Search and Search Visibility and Search Performance10 of 130 measured prompts AI Recommendations8 of 69 measured prompts Chatgpt and Gemini and Brand Mentions5 of 28 measured prompts Competitors and AI Answers5 of 53 measured prompts Marketing Teams and AI Visibility and Visibility Tool4 of 50 measured prompts

View public topics →

Cited pages

Showing 1 of 18 safe exact pages

https://www.fokal.com/tools/ai-visibility-tools/47 prompts

Search this website’s pages →

Cited alongside

Showing 8 relationships

airops.com86 shared prompts · Compare reddit.com85 shared prompts · Compare arxiv.org82 shared prompts · Compare techradar.com79 shared prompts · Compare ahrefs.com59 shared prompts · Compare semrush.com59 shared prompts · Compare tryprofound.com58 shared prompts · Compare elmohq.com54 shared prompts · Compare

Not observed for supported topics

Supported measured topics where this website was not observed. This is an evidence boundary, not a recommendation or proof of a content gap.

Showing 6 topics

Construction software and suppliers703 eligible prompts Global payroll and international work453 eligible prompts Product Teams and customer-facing Integrations420 eligible prompts Automation AI and AI Agents342 eligible prompts Privacy Blockchain and Private294 eligible prompts Medallia and Iterate and Discussio273 eligible prompts

Own this website? Request a licensing review →