Skip to content

What AI Cites

Explore Methodology About

Search websites, topics, or cited URLs

Loading…

What AI Cites

Methodology Coverage About Corrections Licensing review

getminds.ai source evidence — What AI Cites

Explore/Website/getminds.ai

getminds.ai

Measured panel · Aug 2, 2026

49 of 21,320 measured prompts cited getminds.ai.

Observed citation support, not traffic, demand, quality, or a forecast. Methodology

Topics

Showing 8 of 24 measured topics

Medallia and Iterate and Discussio9 of 273 measured prompts Focus Groups and Groups Enterprise6 of 13 measured prompts Concept Testing and Iterative and Tools Concept3 of 25 measured prompts Panel Management and Customer Panel and Member Panel3 of 32 measured prompts Testing Software and User Testing3 of 36 measured prompts Ux Research and Research Repository3 of 95 measured prompts Brand Mentions and AI Brand2 of 192 measured prompts Longitudinal Research and Research Platform2 of 37 measured prompts

View public topics →

Cited pages

Showing 0 of 21 safe exact pages

No safe exact pages are available for this website.

Search this website’s pages →

Cited alongside

Showing 8 relationships

reddit.com46 shared prompts · Compare koji.so38 shared prompts · Compare capterra.com30 shared prompts · Compare outset.ai28 shared prompts · Compare getperspective.ai27 shared prompts · Compare conveo.ai26 shared prompts · Compare mastercard.com25 shared prompts · Compare g2.com21 shared prompts · Compare

Not observed for supported topics

Supported measured topics where this website was not observed. This is an evidence boundary, not a recommendation or proof of a content gap.

Showing 6 topics

Construction software and suppliers703 eligible prompts Global payroll and international work453 eligible prompts Product Teams and customer-facing Integrations420 eligible prompts Privacy Blockchain and Private294 eligible prompts Identity Verification251 eligible prompts Contract Review and Counsel and Word240 eligible prompts

Own this website? Request a licensing review →