Skip to content

What AI Cites

Explore Methodology About

Search websites, topics, or cited URLs

Loading…

What AI Cites

Methodology Coverage About Corrections Licensing review

partner.microsoft.com source evidence — What AI Cites

Explore/Website/partner.microsoft.com

partner.microsoft.com

Measured panel · Aug 2, 2026

28 of 21,320 measured prompts cited partner.microsoft.com.

Observed citation support, not traffic, demand, quality, or a forecast. Methodology

Topics

Showing 7 of 7 measured topics

Help Microsoft and Consulting Services20 of 133 measured prompts Consulting Build and Consulting Help and Build Custom2 of 21 measured prompts Consulting Partner and Hire Consulting and Partner Business2 of 27 measured prompts AI Consulting and Companies AI and AI Development1 of 155 measured prompts AI Copilots and Pasting1 of 21 measured prompts Digital Adoption and Solutions Employee1 of 30 measured prompts Supply Chain and Firms Supply1 of 48 measured prompts

Cited pages

Showing 0 of 25 safe exact pages

No safe exact pages are available for this website.

Search this website’s pages →

Cited alongside

Showing 8 relationships

microsoft.com18 shared prompts · Compare learn.microsoft.com13 shared prompts · Compare accenture.com11 shared prompts · Compare avanade.com10 shared prompts · Compare deloitte.com10 shared prompts · Compare epcgroup.net9 shared prompts · Compare pwc.com9 shared prompts · Compare azure.microsoft.com8 shared prompts · Compare

Not observed for supported topics

Supported measured topics where this website was not observed. This is an evidence boundary, not a recommendation or proof of a content gap.

Showing 6 topics

Construction software and suppliers703 eligible prompts Global payroll and international work453 eligible prompts Product Teams and customer-facing Integrations420 eligible prompts Automation AI and AI Agents342 eligible prompts Privacy Blockchain and Private294 eligible prompts Medallia and Iterate and Discussio273 eligible prompts

Own this website? Request a licensing review →