Skip to content

What AI Cites

Explore Methodology About

Search websites, topics, or cited URLs

Loading…

What AI Cites

Methodology Coverage About Corrections Licensing review

zappi.io source evidence — What AI Cites

Explore/Website/zappi.io

zappi.io

Measured panel · Aug 2, 2026

21 of 21,320 measured prompts cited zappi.io.

Observed citation support, not traffic, demand, quality, or a forecast. Methodology

Topics

Showing 8 of 10 measured topics

Medallia and Iterate and Discussio5 of 273 measured prompts Concept Testing and Iterative and Tools Concept4 of 25 measured prompts Continuous Research and Alwayson Research3 of 65 measured prompts Click Testing and Testing AI and Message Testing2 of 37 measured prompts Ux Research and Research Repository2 of 95 measured prompts Drawers and Stylish and Patio1 of 3 measured prompts Insights Synthesis and Aipowered Insights1 of 84 measured prompts Longitudinal Research and Research Platform1 of 37 measured prompts

View public topics →

Cited pages

Showing 0 of 8 safe exact pages

No safe exact pages are available for this website.

Search this website’s pages →

Cited alongside

Showing 8 relationships

mastercard.com16 shared prompts · Compare outset.ai15 shared prompts · Compare qualtrics.com15 shared prompts · Compare koji.so14 shared prompts · Compare reddit.com13 shared prompts · Compare surveymonkey.com12 shared prompts · Compare askattest.com11 shared prompts · Compare cbinsights.com11 shared prompts · Compare

Not observed for supported topics

Supported measured topics where this website was not observed. This is an evidence boundary, not a recommendation or proof of a content gap.

Showing 6 topics

Construction software and suppliers703 eligible prompts Global payroll and international work453 eligible prompts Product Teams and customer-facing Integrations420 eligible prompts Automation AI and AI Agents342 eligible prompts Privacy Blockchain and Private294 eligible prompts Identity Verification251 eligible prompts

Own this website? Request a licensing review →